Instructions for authors
EDITION 2026
1. ABOUT THE JOURNAL
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health (Health Care & Global Health, ISSN-L 2522-7270) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal edited and sponsored by the University of Sciences and Humanities (UCH). The journal aims to disseminate high-quality research in the field of health, supporting knowledge development and evidence-based decision-making at national and international levels.
1.1. Scope
The journal publishes original research articles in health sciences, public health, and global health, including clinical and epidemiological studies, community health, health systems and services, health policy, social determinants of health, health education, and related fields. It seeks to provide evidence that is relevant and applicable to both national and international contexts.
1.2. Audience
The journal targets researchers, healthcare professionals, educators, policymakers, health managers, and students in the health sciences interested in the generation, analysis, and application of scientific evidence in health, public health, and global health.
1.3. Publication frequency
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health has evolved its publication frequency as part of its editorial development.
- In 2017–2018, the journal published one issue per year.
- From 2019 to 2024, it was published bimonthly.
- In 2025, three issues were published annually.
- Starting in 2026, the journal will adopt a quarterly schedule, publishing four issues per year in March, June, September, and December, ensuring consistency and timeliness in its editorial calendar.
1.4. Languages of publication
Manuscripts may be submitted in Spanish, English, or Portuguese to maximize accessibility, dissemination, and international impact of research findings.
1.5. Indexing
The journal is indexed in several academic and bibliographic databases, including:
- PKP Index
- LILACS
- Dialnet
- Latindex Catalog 2.0
- REDIB
- Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI)
- MIAR
- AmeliCA
- EuroPub
These indexations enhance the visibility, dissemination, and global accessibility of its scientific content.
2. JOURNAL POLICY
Manuscripts submitted to Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health undergo an initial editorial assessment by the Editorial Committee to ensure thematic relevance, scientific quality, and compliance with journal guidelines. Manuscripts passing this stage proceed to external peer review, aimed at enhancing clarity, consistency, and methodological rigor without compromising originality, intellectual independence, or the authors’ viewpoints.
The Editorial Committee issues a preliminary decision within approximately 15 calendar days from submission. The peer review process is typically completed within 30 calendar days. Any required extensions will be promptly communicated to the corresponding author.
2.1. Originality policy
All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under simultaneous review elsewhere. Redundant, duplicate, or fragmented publications are considered unacceptable.
2.2. Anti-plagiarism policy
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and any unauthorized use of others’ work. All manuscripts may be screened using similarity-detection tools (e.g., Turnitin). In cases of conduct that violates scientific integrity, the journal will act in accordance with the procedures and flowcharts established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which may include manuscript rejection, retraction, notification of affiliated institutions, or other editorial actions.
2.3. Preprint policy
Manuscripts previously disseminated as preprints are accepted. This does not constitute prior publication or affect the originality of the work, provided it is disclosed at the time of submission.
2.4. Duplicate publications and translations
Authors must disclose if a manuscript, or a substantially similar version, has been previously published in print, electronically, or in public repositories.
The journal may consider previously published work if:
a) The original journal has ceased operations; or
b) The manuscript was published in a different language, with proper authorization and transparent citation of the original source.
In such cases, authors must provide the full reference of the prior publication, reproduction or translation authorization if applicable, and an editorial justification demonstrating the scientific value and relevance of the new publication.
2.5. Open access and digital preservation
2.5.1. Open access
The journal is fully open access, committed to the immediate and unrestricted dissemination of scientific knowledge. All articles are freely and permanently available without cost to readers. They may be read, downloaded, copied, distributed, printed, searched, or linked, provided proper attribution is given to the authors and the journal.
The journal does not charge article processing or publication fees (no APCs). All content is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, allowing use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction—including commercial use—provided authors and the journal are credited. This policy aligns with open-access principles, promoting equitable access to scientific knowledge and maximizing its impact in health and global health.
2.5.2. Digital preservation
Digital preservation is ensured through Open Journal Systems (OJS) and participation in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), a LOCKSS-based distributed system. This guarantees long-term integrity, availability, and permanent access to published articles in PDF and XML formats, as well as their metadata via OAI-PMH.
2.6. Corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern
The journal is committed to scientific integrity and editorial transparency. In cases of errors, inconsistencies, or potential ethical violations, actions will follow COPE guidelines and established editorial procedures.
2.6.1. Corrections
Corrections are issued for unintentional errors that do not substantially affect scientific validity, results, or conclusions, including typographical errors, authorship, affiliation, tables, figures, or references. Corrections are published transparently, linked to the original article, and clearly labeled.
2.6.2. Retractions
Articles will be retracted in cases of serious errors or scientific misconduct, including but not limited to:
- Significant plagiarism or self-plagiarism
- Undeclared duplicate publication
- Fabrication, falsification, or data manipulation
- Serious ethical violations
- Methodological errors invalidating results or conclusions
Retractions are published prominently, identifying the retracted article and explaining the reasons, in accordance with COPE recommendations. The original article remains accessible, clearly marked as retracted, preserving the integrity of the scientific record.
2.6.3. Expressions of concern
An expression of concern may be issued when there are credible indications of potential irregularities, but the investigation is incomplete or a definitive decision cannot yet be made. This notice remains linked to the affected article until resolved through correction, retraction, or other appropriate editorial action.
2.6.4. Editorial procedure
Decisions regarding corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern are made by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Committee. Authors, reviewers, affiliated institutions, or other relevant parties may be involved as necessary.
2.7. Diversity, equity, and inclusion policy
The journal promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion across all editorial processes, ensuring fair treatment and non-discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, nationality, language, religion, ideology, socioeconomic status, or other personal characteristics. The journal values multiple scientific perspectives and encourages equitable participation of authors, reviewers, and editors.
2.8. Inclusive and non-sexist language policy
Authors are encouraged to use precise, inclusive, and non-sexist language in manuscripts, respecting grammatical accuracy and scientific rigor. The journal promotes expressions that avoid gender bias, stereotypes, or discrimination, ensuring clear, respectful, and equitable scientific communication.
3. JOURNAL SECTIONS
3.1. Editorial
Opinion pieces expressing the viewpoints and reflections of Editorial Committee members or invited authors, addressing current topics, relevant debates, or recent research in the field of health.
3.2. Original article
Reports the results of original, unpublished scientific research. Studies may use quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods and must comply with current methodological and ethical standards.
3.3. Brief communication
Concise reports of original, unpublished research. These articles are shorter than original articles but maintain scientific and methodological rigor.
3.4. Review article
Scientific articles based on rigorous and systematic literature reviews. This includes narrative reviews, scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
3.5. Research protocol
Manuscripts detailing the methodological design of health research prior to obtaining results, aimed at promoting transparency, reproducibility, and scientific quality.
Protocols must include, at a minimum: study rationale, objectives, design, population and sample, procedures, analysis plan, ethical considerations, and study registration status if applicable.
3.6. Case report
Detailed reports of one or more clinical or epidemiological cases of particular interest due to rarity, atypical presentation, educational value, or contribution to scientific knowledge.
3.7. Clinical guideline
Documents providing evidence-based recommendations and guidance for clinical practice, developed using recognized methodologies for clinical practice guideline development.
3.8. Health education
Articles related to teaching, training, and professional development in medicine and other health fields, including studies on pedagogical methods, educational innovation, and program evaluation.
3.9. Letter to the editor
Section for critical comments, academic reflections, or individual viewpoints on relevant health topics, including responses to previously published articles. This section may also include research findings that, due to scope, length, or methodology, do not meet criteria for publication as an original article or brief communication, but still provide valuable information to the scientific community.
3.10. Commentaries
Contributions from experts, authorities, or invited researchers analyzing current topics, scientific debates, or recent research of interest to the academic community.
3.11. Special article
Manuscripts of academic or technical nature that do not fit the previously described sections but are considered of interest for publication by the Editorial Committee.
4. AUTHOR GUIDELINES
4.1. General criteria for manuscript acceptance
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health reserves the rights to reproduce and disseminate content in accordance with its editorial policy and the adopted publication license.
Submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under simultaneous consideration elsewhere, either in whole or in part.
4.2. Manuscript preparation and submission
Authors should prepare manuscripts using Microsoft Word and submit figures in their original format or as vector images.
Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively through the journal’s Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform, available at:
http://revista.uch.edu.pe/index.php/hgh/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
Authors must register in the system prior to submission.
4.3. Required submission files
4.3.1. Full manuscript
- Manuscripts must be anonymized, with no information identifying the authors.
- Tables, figures, and other graphical materials should be included at the end of the manuscript, numbered and cited in the text.
- Manuscripts should follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Authors may also consult previously published articles in the journal as a reference.
4.3.2. Authorship declaration and publication authorization
This document must include:
- Author list with personal details, ORCID, email, institutional affiliation, city, country, profession, and academic degrees.
- Declarations regarding:
- Publication conditions and manuscript originality
- Scientific integrity
- Review and approval by an ethics committee, if applicable
- Data availability
- Authorization for article publication
- Supplementary information:
- Author contributions (CRediT taxonomy)
- Declaration of AI tool use
- Conflicts of interest
- Acknowledgments
- Data availability and access
- Funding
Note: If authors encounter difficulties downloading forms, they may request them via email:
- Email 1: editorhgh@uch.edu.pe
- Email 2: peruvianjournal.hgh@gmail.com
4.4. Manuscript receipt confirmation and tracking
Receipt of the manuscript will be communicated to the corresponding author via email.
Authors can track the status of their manuscript through the OJS platform or by contacting the editorial team at the emails provided.
4.5. Authorship
Authors must have made substantial contributions to the study’s conception and design, data acquisition, analysis or interpretation, and/or manuscript drafting or critical revision, and be able to assume public responsibility for its content.
The journal accepts a maximum of eight (8) authors per manuscript. Exceptions may be made when a justified methodological rationale is provided, adhering to ICMJE authorship criteria, subject to editorial evaluation.
4.6. Copyright
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health publishes content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Authors retain copyright. This license allows third parties to copy, distribute, publicly communicate, adapt, and create derivative works—including commercial use—provided appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the publication source.
4.7. Length and formatting
General specifications for manuscript length and presentation, excluding tables, figures, and references, are detailed in Table 1.
Manuscripts must be submitted in Microsoft Word, A4 size, double-spaced, Times New Roman, font size 12, with 2.5 cm margins.
The Editorial Committee reserves the right to request adjustments to length or format or to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the established guidelines.
Table 1. Word count, tables, figures, and references limits by article type.
|
|
Title |
Abstract |
Content |
Tables and Figures |
References |
|
Editorial |
15 |
-- |
1200 |
2 |
10-15 |
|
Original article |
15 |
250 |
3500 |
6 |
30-50 |
|
Brief communication |
15 |
250 |
1500 |
3 |
20-30 |
|
Review article |
15 |
250 |
4500 |
6 |
60-100 |
|
Research protocol |
15 |
250 |
3000 |
4 |
30-50 |
|
Case report |
15 |
250 |
2000 |
4 |
20-30 |
|
Clinical guideline |
15 |
250 |
5000 |
6 |
60-100 |
|
Health education |
15 |
250 |
3000 |
4 |
30-40 |
|
Letter to the Editor |
15 |
-- |
1000 |
1 |
10-15 |
|
Commentary |
15 |
-- |
1200 |
2 |
10-20 |
|
Special Article |
15 |
250 |
4000 |
6 |
30-50 |
|
(*) The numbers are for reference only. In exceptional cases, and with proper justification, the Editorial Committee may authorize the submission of manuscripts exceeding the established limits. |
|||||
4.8. Title
The manuscript title should not exceed 15 words and must clearly, specifically, and concisely reflect the content of the work. The use of technical jargon, abbreviations, and acronyms should be avoided whenever possible.
Authors must also provide a running title (short title), which should not exceed half the number of words of the main title.
4.9. Abstract
Original articles and review articles must include a structured abstract organized into the following sections: a) Objectives, b) Materials and Methods, c) Results, d) Conclusion.
Additionally, all manuscripts must include an abstract in English, maintaining the same structure and content as the main abstract. Maximum abstract length is detailed in Table 1.
Authors should provide 3 to 6 keywords. For abstracts in Spanish or Portuguese, keywords should be selected from the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS). For the English abstract, keywords should be selected from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).
4.10. Article Body
Original articles and brief communications should follow the IMRaD structure: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, and Discussion.
Review articles may be organized with appropriate headings and subheadings according to the nature and objectives of the work. For other article types, following the IMRaD structure is not mandatory; content should be organized according to the characteristics of each section.
Authors should adhere to recommendations from the EQUATOR Network (https://www.equator-network.org/) and relevant international reporting guidelines based on study type (e.g., STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA).
4.11. References
References should follow the Vancouver style. All references must be cited in the text using consecutive Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, 4, …, n).
In-text citations may be placed in brackets, e.g., [1]. Authors should refer to Citing Medicine: The NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers by the National Library of Medicine for proper reference formatting.
Use of reference management software (e.g., Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote) is recommended to ensure citation consistency and accuracy.
4.12. Tables
Tables should be presented clearly and concisely, with column headers indicating units of measurement in brief form. When using relative measures (percentages, rates, indices, or others), the calculation base must be clearly specified.
Cells corresponding to non-applicable data should indicate “NA.” When information is unavailable due to the absence of observations, use ellipsis (…) to indicate missing data.
All tables must be submitted in editable format (not as images), integrated at the end of the manuscript, and numbered consecutively according to their order of appearance in the text.
4.13. Figures
All illustrations (graphs, diagrams, line drawings, maps, photographs, or others) must be submitted in the original program used to create them, with a minimum resolution of 320 dpi.
Figures should highlight trends, patterns, and comparisons clearly and accurately, complementing but not duplicating the text. Figure titles must be clear, concise, and descriptive.
Maps and drawings must include a graphic scale and International System units. Figures should also be submitted as separate editable or vector files (SVG, EPS, PDF, CPT, AI) or in high-resolution format as appropriate.
As with tables, figures should be integrated at the end of the manuscript and numbered consecutively according to their order of appearance in the text.
4.14. Supplementary material
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health accepts supplementary material that complements the manuscript content, such as datasets, instruments, methodological appendices, or additional tables or figures.
Supplementary material will be evaluated as part of the editorial process and, if accepted, will be published digitally alongside the article, clearly identified and cited in the main text.
5. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health is committed to scientific quality, academic integrity, and adherence to ethical best practices by all stakeholders involved in the editorial process.
This statement is based on the Good Publication Practice Guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and establishes the ethical principles applicable to authors, reviewers, and editors. The journal also adheres to the principles, best practices, and obligations set forth in the National Code of Scientific Integrity.
Research involving human participants, including the use of human biological material or identifiable information, must comply with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association, the guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), and the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Research involving animals must comply with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Research Council of the National Academies, as well as the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments).
5.1. Research ethics committee approval
Manuscripts reporting research involving humans, human biological material, identifiable data, or animal studies must explicitly state that the study was approved by a recognized Research Ethics Committee, indicating the institution name, approval number, and date.
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health may request the ethics committee report. Studies based on freely accessible secondary sources are exempt from ethics committee approval.
When research is exempt from ethical review, authors must explicitly state the reason for exemption in accordance with applicable regulations and, when applicable, the evaluation of a competent committee.
5.2. Informed consent
For studies involving human participants, authors must declare that informed consent was obtained in accordance with international ethical principles and applicable legislation.
For minors or individuals with limited decision-making capacity, consent must have been provided by legal guardians, with assent obtained from the participant when appropriate.
When using secondary databases, medical records, or other information sources, the procedure to ensure confidentiality and data anonymization must be clearly stated.
5.3. Conflicts of interest
All authors must declare any real, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest—financial, institutional, professional, academic, or personal—that could influence the interpretation of results.
If no conflicts exist, authors must include the explicit statement: “The authors declare no conflicts of interest.”
5.4. Funding
Authors must disclose all sources of study funding, including public or private institutions, funding agencies, non-governmental organizations, or other entities.
If the research did not receive specific funding, the statement should read: “The research did not receive specific funding.”
5.5. Data availability
Authors must indicate whether the data supporting the study results are available, and if so, specify the repository, link, or access conditions.
In alignment with open science principles, Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health recommends using Zenodo for its ease of use and DOI assignment; however, authors may use any repository that guarantees a persistent identifier (DOI) for citation purposes.
If data cannot be shared for ethical, legal, or confidentiality reasons, this must be explicitly stated.
5.6. Registration of systematic reviews
The journal recommends that systematic reviews and meta-analyses be pre-registered in a recognized public registry, such as the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) or equivalent.
When applicable, the registration number must be included in the manuscript to promote transparency, reduce risk of bias, and strengthen methodological integrity.
5.7. Clinical trial registration
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health requires that clinical trials be registered in a publicly accessible registry prior to participant recruitment.
For studies conducted in Peru, the Peruvian Clinical Trials Registry (REPEC) of the National Institute of Health is accepted. For trials conducted in other countries, official national registries or registries recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO), including ClinicalTrials.gov administered by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), are considered valid.
5.8. Scientific integrity and misconduct
The journal strictly prohibits any form of scientific misconduct, including but not limited to: plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data manipulation, fabrication, or falsification of results.
5.9. Authorship and author contributions
Authorship must comply with the criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). All authors must have made substantial contributions to the study and assume public responsibility for its content.
Including authors without a genuine scientific contribution—due to friendship, hierarchy, institutional recognition, or other non-scientific reasons—constitutes an ethical violation (honorary, guest, or ghost authorship) and may lead to editorial rejection or observation.
All manuscripts must include a detailed statement of each author’s contributions according to ICMJE criteria. This information forms part of the Authorship Declaration and will be published alongside the article.
All authors are obligated to facilitate corrections for errors. In cases of ethical misconduct detected in submitted or published work, authors will be notified to provide a defense. An ad hoc committee will be established to investigate and evaluate the case. Depending on severity, actions may include article correction or retraction, with notification to the authors’ affiliated institutions.
6. EDITORIAL PROCESS AND PEER REVIEW
6.1. Initial editorial evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health undergo an initial editorial assessment by the Editor-in-Chief and/or Associate Editors to verify: relevance to the journal’s scope, compliance with the author guidelines, basic methodological adequacy, and adherence to ethical principles and scientific integrity.
At this stage, manuscripts may be rejected without peer review if they do not meet the minimum editorial criteria or present substantial deficiencies.
6.2. About the editor
The editor is responsible for evaluating manuscripts fairly, objectively, and impartially, without consideration of the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious or political beliefs, nationality, ethnic background, institutional affiliation, or other personal characteristics.
The editor determines which manuscripts are sent for peer review and which are ready for acceptance after completing the process. The editor must also strictly preserve the confidentiality of evaluated manuscripts, refraining from disclosing any information regarding content, subject matter, authorship, data, analysis, or conclusions, except to individuals directly involved in the editorial process.
The editor must safeguard the interests of readers and authors, promote continuous improvement and innovation of the journal, and ensure the scientific and editorial quality of published articles.
The editor must avoid any real or potential conflict of interest regarding manuscripts under review and promote the publication of corrections, clarifications, rectifications, or retractions when errors are identified or when necessary to preserve the integrity of the scientific record.
6.3. About the editorial board
The Editorial Board is responsible for overseeing, promoting, and safeguarding the principles of editorial ethics. In coordination with the editor, the board must promptly identify, evaluate, and resolve any ethical situation or conflict arising during the editorial process to maintain scientific integrity, transparency, and academic credibility.
The Editorial Board categorically rejects plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data manipulation, fabrication or falsification of results, and any other form of scientific misconduct, regardless of when or how it is detected.
The Editorial Board is committed to facilitating timely publication of corrections, clarifications, rectifications, expressions of concern, retractions, or apologies, when appropriate, in accordance with international guidelines, with the aim of maintaining the reliability of the scientific record.
6.4. About reviewers
Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial evaluation will undergo an external peer review process under a double-blind system, where both author and reviewer identities remain confidential.
Each manuscript will be evaluated by at least two external reviewers, selected based on their expertise and competence in the study’s subject area. Reviewers will provide a technical and scientific assessment aimed at improving the manuscript’s quality, clarity, and validity.
6.5. Use of technological tools in review
At Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health, peer review is fundamentally a human process, based on the reviewers’ critical judgment and academic experience. However, the journal reserves the right to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools exclusively to support preliminary editorial analysis of manuscripts.
Reviewers may also use AI tools responsibly and transparently, solely to assist in manuscript evaluation. In all cases, AI use by reviewers must be declared to the Editorial Board, and it will not replace or condition the reviewer’s academic judgment or individual responsibility.
6.6. Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers will consider, among other aspects:
- Specific components: Title, abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusions, and references.
- General components: Novelty, originality, style, and writing quality.
- Major and minor comments.
- Reviewers must also declare any use of artificial intelligence tools.
6.7. Editorial decisions
Based on reviewers’ reports, the Editorial Board may issue one of the following decisions:
- Accept submission
- Publishable with modifications
- Resubmit for review
- Resubmit to another journal
- Not publishable
- See comments
Reviewer comments will be communicated to authors, who must submit a revised manuscript accompanied by a detailed response letter describing how each comment was addressed.
The Editorial Board reserves the right to make final editorial decisions, even in cases of divergent reviewer opinions.
6.8. Editorial timelines
The journal aims to complete the initial editorial evaluation within approximately 15 calendar days from manuscript receipt. The peer review process has an estimated duration of 30 calendar days.
If extensions are required, authors will be notified in a timely manner.
6.9. Confidentiality and anonymity
All information related to submitted manuscripts will be treated with strict confidentiality. Editors and reviewers agree not to disclose, use, or share manuscript content prior to publication.
Reviewers must declare potential conflicts of interest and refrain from evaluating manuscripts when such conflicts exist.
6.10. Appeals and complaints
Authors may submit well-founded appeals against editorial decisions. These will be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief and/or the Editorial Board, and a new review may be requested if deemed appropriate.
7. USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health acknowledges the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research and scientific writing. However, it reaffirms that ethical, scientific, and legal responsibility for the content of manuscripts rests solely with human authors.
7.1. General principles
The use of generative AI tools may be permitted only as support for writing, linguistic editing, grammar correction, translation, or style enhancement, provided that such use is transparent, responsible, and ethically justified.
AI tools must not be listed as authors, nor may they assume intellectual, methodological, or ethical responsibility for the manuscript content.
7.2. Mandatory declaration of AI use
Authors must explicitly declare the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, specifying:
- The name of the tool used.
- The purpose of its use (linguistic editing, translation, etc.).
- The sections of the manuscript in which it was employed.
This declaration must be included in the Authorship Declaration.
7.3. Prohibited uses of AI
The use of AI tools is not permitted to:
- Generate data, results, or conclusions.
- Replace the authors’ critical analysis, scientific interpretation, or academic judgment.
- Fabricate, modify, or manipulate images, tables, or results.
- Substantively write key sections of the manuscript without direct intellectual input from the authors.
7.4. Responsibility and detection
Authors assume full responsibility for the truthfulness, originality, and accuracy of the manuscript content, including any AI-assisted text.
The journal reserves the right to use detection tools to identify undeclared or inappropriate use of AI and to implement appropriate editorial measures in accordance with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.
8. ARTICLE SUBMISSION PROCESS
9. EDITORIAL INQUIRIES
For editorial inquiries, manuscript submissions, or communications related to the editorial process, authors and readers may contact Peruvian Journal of Health Care and Global Health via the following email addresses:
- Email 1: editorhgh@uch.edu.pe
- Email 2: peruvianjournal.hgh@gmail.com
10. ANNEXES
- Authorship Declaration and Authorization for the Publication of a Scientific Article
- Submission Process Guide
- Peer Review Form
- Cover Letter





