Bladder Migration of an Intrauterine Device: Management Through Minimally Invasive Surgery
Migración vesical de dispositivo intrauterino: resolución por cirugía mínimamente invasiva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22258/hgh.v10i2.430Abstract
Uterine perforation associated with an intrauterine device (IUD) is a rare complication that can cause extrauterine migration and compromise adjacent organs, such as the urinary bladder. We present the case of a 40-year-old patient with a history of two cesarean sections, who had a copper IUD inserted 1 year and 7 months prior. Ten months after insertion, she experienced a pregnancy that resulted in a missed miscarriage, with the device no longer present in the uterine cavity. Imaging studies allowed the IUD to be located in the pelvic cavity, in close proximity to the bladder. The patient reported mild pelvic pain, so a diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy was performed. The device was identified in the vesicouterine space, adhered to the bladder fundus. Cold dissection was performed, achieving complete removal of the device. The postoperative course was favorable. Uterine perforation can occur immediately during insertion or later due to progressive erosion. Factors such as the postpartum period, breastfeeding, insertion technique, and operator experience influence its occurrence. Although bladder perforation is infrequent, it is clinically relevant due to the potential associated complications. Laparoscopy is the preferred approach for its management. Early suspicion and the use of imaging techniques are essential when sutures are absent or when there is a pregnancy with an IUD, allowing for safe and effective resolution even in atypical locations. Keywords: Uterine Perforation; Laparoscopy; Urinary Bladder; Intrauterine Devices (Source: MeSH, NLM).Downloads
References
Lanzola EL, Auber M, Ketvertis K. Intrauterine device placement and removal. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Sun X, Xue M, Deng X, et al. Clinical characteristics and intraoperative findings of uterine perforation in patients using intrauterine devices (IUDs). Gynecol Surg. 2018;15(1):3. DOI:10.1186/s10397-017-1032-2.
Pareja HBJ, Canedo EA, Cajango DP, et al. Colecistite com fístula estômago e intestino: um relato de caso. Int Seven J Health Res. 2024;3:1091–1093. DOI:10.56238/isevjhv3n4-012.
Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, et al. Retained intrauterine device (IUD): triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:9362962. DOI:10.1155/2018/9362962.
Seto E, Liu EN, Pereira N. Perforated intrauterine device in the abdomen: leave or retrieve? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025;32:103–104. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.07.025.
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, et al. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2015;91(4):274–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007.
Reed SD, Zhou X, Ichikawa L, et al. Intrauterine device-related uterine perforation incidence and risk (APEX-IUD): a large multisite cohort study. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2103–2112. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00015-0.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:19–32. DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S85546.
Ples L, Sima RM, Moisei C, et al. An intrauterine contraceptive device: where did we find it after 29 years of insertion? A case report J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(1):131–133.
Kho KA, Chamsy DJ. Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):596–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.123.
Askarova K, Mamadjanova S, Ayubov B. When contraception goes rogue: bladder migration of an intrauterine device presenting as refractory cystitis. Urol Case Rep. 2025;63:103177. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2025.103177.
Liu SX, Dong XY. Using laparoscope to remove an ectopic intrauterine device in the anterior wall of urinary bladder: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2024;12:3221–3225. DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3221.
Tabatabaei F, Hosseini STN, Hakimi P, et al. Risk factors of uterine perforation with intrauterine devices. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):538. DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3.
Gatz JL, Armstrong MA, Postlethwaite D, et al. Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(1):57.e1–57.e13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.062.
Varlas VN, Meianu AI, Radoi AI, et al. Intrauterine contraceptive device migrated to the urinary tract: case report and literature review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(14):4233. DOI:10.3390/jcm13144233.
Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, et al. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1546–1551. DOI:10.1093/humrep/det074.
Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA. Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. JSLS. 2012;16(2):236–241. DOI:10.4293/108680812X13427982377265.
Zhang M, Sun Z, Yang Y, et al. Complete bladder perforation caused by intrauterine devices: a nationwide case series. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;49(7):1821–1826. DOI: 10.1111/jog.15661.
Gupta A, Pajai S, Reddy LS, et al. Hysteroscopic removal of an intrauterine contraceptive device obstructed by polyps: a case report. Cureus. 2025;17(1):e77990. DOI:10.7759/cureus.77990.
Sanders AP, Sanders B. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1408–1409. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.09.004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katty Magdalena Barahona-Ochoa, Erika Paola Delgado-Astudillo, Tania Elizabeth Chacón-Muñoz, Rodrigo Xavier Morales-Villacis, Jessenia Elizabeth Martinez-Soto, Priscila Jazmine Sarango-Lapo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and will guarantee to the journal right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows third parties to share the work whenever attribuying their author and first publication in this journal.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).






